PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VBU.NEO (Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and QQU.TO (BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBU.NEO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Bond Index (CAD Hedged), while QQU.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBU.NEO returned -0.16%/yr vs 32.96%/yr for QQU.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBU.NEO charges 0.22%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for QQU.TO.

Performance

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VBU.NEO) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBU.NEO achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than QQU.TO's 39.04% return. Over the past 10 years, VBU.NEO has underperformed QQU.TO with an annualized return of -0.16%, while QQU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 32.96% annualized return.

VBU.NEO

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-2.13%
6M
-2.49%
1Y
-1.03%
3Y*
-0.45%
5Y*
-2.71%
10Y*
-0.16%

QQU.TO

1D
-1.13%
1M
17.08%
YTD
39.04%
6M
34.49%
1Y
77.53%
3Y*
46.17%
5Y*
22.66%
10Y*
32.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBU.NEO
Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF		-2.13%1.31%-2.90%4.56%-13.69%-2.10%7.24%7.76%-1.05%3.47%
QQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF		39.04%26.77%40.01%114.00%-61.73%52.20%83.84%80.24%-11.03%68.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VBU.NEO and QQU.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2014

0.04

The correlation between VBU.NEO and QQU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF

Often compared with VBU.NEO:
VBU.NEO vs. VBG.NEOVBU.NEO vs. VAB.TOVBU.NEO vs. XAGH.TOVBU.NEO vs. BNDVBU.NEO vs. PLDI.TOVBU.NEO vs. ZUAG.TOVBU.NEO vs. VFV.TO
Often compared with QQU.TO:
QQU.TO vs. QLDQQU.TO vs. TQQQQQU.TO vs. QQC.TOQQU.TO vs. XQQU.TOQQU.TO vs. VCN.TOQQU.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO

Return for Risk

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VBU.NEO
VBU.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VBU.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBU.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBU.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
VBU.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBU.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
QQU.TO
QQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VBU.NEO) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VBU.NEOQQU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.22
2.46

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.26
2.95

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.38

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

3.01

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

10.32

-10.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBU.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the QQU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBU.NEO and QQU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VBU.NEOQQU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

2.46

-2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

0.51

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.74

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.55

-0.48

Drawdowns

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBU.NEO drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, smaller than the maximum QQU.TO drawdown of -78.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBU.NEO and QQU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VBU.NEOQQU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-78.51%

+59.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

-25.85%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.80%

-43.00%

+36.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-64.83%

+46.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.38%

-64.83%

+45.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.47%

-1.60%

-13.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-17.02%

+10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

7.54%

-5.80%

Volatility

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VBU.NEO) is 2.45%, while BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that VBU.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VBU.NEOQQU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

9.28%

-6.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.49%

24.30%

-20.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.79%

31.70%

-26.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.33%

44.84%

-38.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.97%

44.85%

-38.88%

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBU.NEO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QQU.TO's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

VBU.NEO vs. QQU.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither VBU.NEO nor QQU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBU.NEO
Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF		0.00%0.00%0.24%2.72%2.31%1.83%2.14%2.36%2.28%2.20%2.19%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

VBU.NEO and QQU.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VBU.NEO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VBU.NEO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QQU.TO.

VBU.NEO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while QQU.TO is Nasdaq-100. VBU.NEO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Bond Index (CAD Hedged), while QQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VBU.NEO and 1.46% for QQU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBU.NEO and QQU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer