VBU.NEO vs. EIDO
VBU.NEO (Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and EIDO (iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBU.NEO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Bond Index (CAD Hedged), while EIDO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBU.NEO returned -0.16%/yr vs -3.58%/yr for EIDO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBU.NEO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EIDO.
Performance
VBU.NEO vs. EIDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VBU.NEO is traded in CAD, while EIDO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIDO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBU.NEO achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly higher than EIDO's -35.00% return. Over the past 10 years, VBU.NEO has outperformed EIDO with an annualized return of -0.16%, while EIDO has yielded a comparatively lower -3.58% annualized return.
VBU.NEO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -2.13%
- 6M
- -2.49%
- 1Y
- -1.03%
- 3Y*
- -0.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.71%
- 10Y*
- -0.16%
EIDO
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -35.00%
- 6M
- -35.79%
- 1Y
- -31.49%
- 3Y*
- -16.35%
- 5Y*
- -6.51%
- 10Y*
- -3.58%
VBU.NEO vs. EIDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBU.NEO Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF | -2.13% | 1.31% | -2.90% | 4.56% | -13.69% | -2.10% | 7.24% | 7.76% | -1.05% | 3.47% |
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | -35.00% | 0.09% | -5.55% | 0.30% | 6.96% | -1.50% | -8.70% | 0.12% | -3.32% | 11.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBU.NEO and EIDO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, VBU.NEO and EIDO have become more correlated (0.23) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBU.NEO vs. EIDO — Risk / Return Rank
VBU.NEO
EIDO
VBU.NEO vs. EIDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VBU.NEO) and iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBU.NEO | EIDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.75 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.84 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | -2.50 | +1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBU.NEO | EIDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | -1.41 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | -0.36 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | -0.16 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.00 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
VBU.NEO vs. EIDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBU.NEO drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, smaller than the maximum EIDO drawdown of -52.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBU.NEO and EIDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBU.NEO | EIDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.38% | -52.56% | +33.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -37.51% | +32.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.80% | -44.61% | +37.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.46% | -44.61% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.38% | -52.56% | +33.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.47% | -45.84% | +30.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -13.80% | +7.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 12.60% | -10.86% |
Volatility
VBU.NEO vs. EIDO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VBU.NEO) is 2.45%, while iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that VBU.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBU.NEO | EIDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 6.95% | -4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.49% | 18.29% | -14.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79% | 22.42% | -17.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 18.33% | -12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 22.83% | -16.86% |
VBU.NEO vs. EIDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBU.NEO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EIDO's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBU.NEO vs. EIDO - Dividend Comparison
VBU.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | 5.55% | 3.56% | 5.20% | 2.94% | 2.53% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.78% | 1.99% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.67% |
VBU.NEO Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 2.72% | 2.31% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.36% | 2.28% | 2.20% | 2.19% | 2.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBU.NEO and EIDO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBU.NEO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBU.NEO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIDO.
VBU.NEO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while EIDO is Asia Pacific Equities. VBU.NEO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Bond Index (CAD Hedged), while EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VBU.NEO and 0.59% for EIDO.
Find the right allocation for VBU.NEO and EIDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer