PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.53%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


VBR

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.39%
YTD
11.67%
6M
11.95%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
10.53%

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.67%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and VTV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.89

The correlation between VBR and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBR vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
VTV

Industrials

18.1%
14.0%

Financial Services

17.6%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
4.0%

Technology

10.6%
13.4%

Real Estate

10.1%
2.8%

Healthcare

7.9%
14.5%

Basic Materials

6.3%
3.1%

Energy

5.2%
8.1%

Utilities

4.8%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
9.4%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.3%

Industrials

VBR
18.1%
VTV
14.0%

Financial Services

VBR
17.6%
VTV
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.4%
VTV
4.0%

Technology

VBR
10.6%
VTV
13.4%

Real Estate

VBR
10.1%
VTV
2.8%

Healthcare

VBR
7.9%
VTV
14.5%

Basic Materials

VBR
6.3%
VTV
3.1%

Energy

VBR
5.2%
VTV
8.1%

Utilities

VBR
4.8%
VTV
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
VTV
9.4%

Communication Services

VBR
2.5%
VTV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBRVTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

2.61

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

3.74

-1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

4.15

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.32

15.69

-5.37

VBR vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBRVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.61

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.81

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.51

-0.10

Drawdowns

VBR vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-59.27%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-6.35%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-14.52%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-17.04%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-36.78%

-8.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-7.87%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.68%

+0.82%

Volatility

VBR vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that VBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

2.52%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

7.55%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

10.11%

+5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

13.88%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

16.67%

+5.06%

VBR vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBR vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and VTV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBR has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 10.53% for VBR. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBR.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.76% for VBR.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer