PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.61% return.


VBR

1D
0.87%
1M
4.91%
YTD
14.60%
6M
12.92%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.99%

SGOV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
14.60%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%32.93%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.61%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and SGOV is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBRSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-273.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

195.55

-194.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

398.20

-395.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

4,461.98

-4,450.76

VBR vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBR vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-0.03%

-61.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-0.01%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-0.01%

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-0.03%

-24.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-0.00%

-8.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

0.00%

+2.50%

Volatility

VBR vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that VBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

0.05%

+4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

0.13%

+10.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.36%

0.20%

+15.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

0.24%

+19.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

0.24%

+21.50%

VBR vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBR vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.71%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and SGOV have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBR has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, VBR leads with 8.36% vs 3.56% for SGOV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VBR has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 1.71% for VBR.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer