PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has outperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 10.33%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return.


VBR

1D
-1.10%
1M
0.32%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.31%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
10.33%

SCHO

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.27%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.29%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%3.47%1.37%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and SCHO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010

-0.13

The correlation between VBR and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VBR vs. SCHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
SCHO

Industrials

18.1%

-

Financial Services

17.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Technology

10.6%
1.1%

Real Estate

10.1%

-

Healthcare

7.9%

-

Basic Materials

6.3%

-

Energy

5.2%

-

Utilities

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Communication Services

2.5%
1.1%

Industrials

VBR
18.1%
SCHO

-

Financial Services

VBR
17.6%
SCHO
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.4%
SCHO

-

Technology

VBR
10.6%
SCHO
1.1%

Real Estate

VBR
10.1%
SCHO

-

Healthcare

VBR
7.9%
SCHO

-

Basic Materials

VBR
6.3%
SCHO

-

Energy

VBR
5.2%
SCHO

-

Utilities

VBR
4.8%
SCHO

-

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
SCHO

-

Communication Services

VBR
2.5%
SCHO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBRSCHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.71

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

15.90

-5.44

VBR vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBRSCHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.30

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.90

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.09

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.99

-0.57

Drawdowns

VBR vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and SCHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRSCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-5.69%

-56.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-0.86%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-0.98%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-5.69%

-18.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-5.69%

-39.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.39%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-0.61%

-7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

0.20%

+2.31%

Volatility

VBR vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.45%. This indicates that VBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRSCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

0.45%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

0.93%

+9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

1.39%

+13.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

1.98%

+17.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

1.56%

+20.17%

VBR vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBR vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than SCHO's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.91%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.77%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and SCHO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBR has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to SCHO (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.33% vs 1.70% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 1.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBR.

SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.77% for VBR.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHO is Government Bonds. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.03% for SCHO.

SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and SCHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer