VBR vs. PRSVX
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and PRSVX (T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund) are both funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while PRSVX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 11.55%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for PRSVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for PRSVX.
Performance
VBR vs. PRSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly lower than PRSVX's 20.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBR having a 11.55% annualized return and PRSVX not far behind at 11.17%.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 15.13%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
PRSVX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 17.93%
- 1Y
- 35.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
VBR vs. PRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 15.13% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
PRSVX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund | 20.23% | 8.31% | 10.84% | 12.34% | -18.53% | 25.47% | 12.49% | 25.82% | -11.58% | 12.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and PRSVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VBR and PRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. PRSVX — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
PRSVX
VBR vs. PRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBR | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.87 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 14.44 | -3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBR vs. PRSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than PRSVX's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and PRSVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -55.37% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.93% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -24.60% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -28.17% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -40.97% | -4.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -7.48% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.36% | +0.14% |
Volatility
VBR vs. PRSVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.90%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 5.25% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 12.39% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 17.09% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 19.83% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 21.04% | +0.67% |
VBR vs. PRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSVX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBR vs. PRSVX - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than PRSVX's 9.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRSVX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund | 9.84% | 11.83% | 9.77% | 3.27% | 5.28% | 6.98% | 2.03% | 4.59% | 9.46% | 3.79% | 3.77% | 22.55% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.71% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VBR and PRSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PRSVX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to VBR (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs PRSVX's -55.37%.
PRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and PRSVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer