VBND vs. ZHOG
VBND (Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF) and ZHOG (F/m Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. VBND is passively managed, while ZHOG is actively managed. Over the past year, VBND returned 6.14% vs 5.65% for ZHOG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBND charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for ZHOG.
Performance
VBND vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than ZHOG's 0.82% return.
VBND
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
ZHOG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 5.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VBND vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 0.55% | 7.31% | 1.26% | 6.19% |
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | 0.82% | 5.98% | 4.94% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBND and ZHOG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between VBND and ZHOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBND vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank
VBND
ZHOG
VBND vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBND | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 3.58 | -2.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 5.64 | -3.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.74 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 4.27 | -2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 18.51 | -13.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBND | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 3.58 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.63 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
VBND vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than ZHOG's maximum drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and ZHOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBND | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -3.66% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -1.31% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.03% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -0.70% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 0.30% | +0.75% |
Volatility
VBND vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) at 0.44%. This indicates that VBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZHOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBND | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 0.44% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 1.14% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 1.59% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 4.01% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 4.01% | +1.44% |
VBND vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBND vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison
VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than ZHOG's 5.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 4.22% | 4.22% | 4.41% | 3.88% | 2.55% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 3.12% | 1.49% |
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | 5.11% | 5.35% | 5.50% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBND and ZHOG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBND has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to ZHOG (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs ZHOG's -3.66%.
On 1-year performance, VBND leads with 6.14% vs 5.65% for ZHOG. On fees, VBND is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, ZHOG has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VBND has performed better with a 6.14% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBND is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for ZHOG.
ZHOG has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.22% for VBND.
They also come from different issuers: Vident and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.43% for ZHOG.
ZHOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBND and ZHOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer