VBND vs. MAMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VBND (Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF) and MAMB (Monarch Ambassador Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - VBND tracks the Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index while MAMB tracks the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VBND returned 0.41%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for MAMB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBND charges 0.41%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for MAMB.

Performance

VBND vs. MAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than MAMB's 2.01% return.

VBND

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: 0.57%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: 4.74%
• 5Y*: 0.41%
• 10Y*: 1.58%

MAMB

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 9.37%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBND vs. MAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF	0.39%	7.31%	1.26%	8.16%	-14.18%	2.13%
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.01%	10.69%	1.32%	4.90%	-13.02%	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VBND and MAMB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021	0.83

The correlation between VBND and MAMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VBND vs. MAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBND

VBND Risk / Return Rank: 37
VBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
VBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
VBND Omega Ratio Rank: 34
VBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VBND Martin Ratio Rank: 35

MAMB

MAMB Risk / Return Rank: 48
MAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
MAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBND vs. MAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VBND	MAMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.66	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	2.33	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.65	-0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.41	7.49	-2.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VBND vs. MAMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the MAMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBND and MAMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VBND	MAMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	1.66	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.10	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.16	+0.15

Drawdowns

VBND vs. MAMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, roughly equal to the maximum MAMB drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and MAMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	VBND	MAMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-19.33%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-3.55%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.60%	-7.38%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.97%	-19.33%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-1.65%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-7.50%	+3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.25%	-0.20%

Volatility

VBND vs. MAMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) is 1.49%, while Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that VBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VBND	MAMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	1.72%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.91%	4.21%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.37%	5.67%	-1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.12%	6.99%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.45%	6.91%	-1.46%

VBND vs. MAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than MAMB's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

VBND vs. MAMB - Dividend Comparison

VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than MAMB's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.44%	2.47%	2.11%	1.73%	0.92%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF	4.23%	4.22%	4.41%	3.88%	2.55%	1.56%	1.98%	3.14%	2.82%	2.00%	3.12%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VBND and MAMB in my portfolio?

VBND and MAMB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VBND or MAMB?

MAMB has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to VBND (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs MAMB's -19.33%.

Which ETF is better, VBND or MAMB?

On 5-year performance, MAMB leads with 0.72% vs 0.41% for VBND. On fees, VBND is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, VBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VBND or MAMB?

Over the 5-year period, MAMB has performed better with a 0.72% return vs 0.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VBND or MAMB?

VBND is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for MAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VBND or MAMB?

VBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.44% for MAMB.

What is the main difference between VBND and MAMB?

VBND tracks Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index, while MAMB tracks Monarch Ambassador Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and Monarch. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 1.49% for MAMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.