VBND vs. CPLS
VBND (Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF) and CPLS (AB Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. VBND is passively managed, while CPLS is actively managed. Over the past year, VBND returned 6.14% vs 5.29% for CPLS. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBND charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CPLS.
Performance
VBND vs. CPLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VBND having a 0.55% return and CPLS slightly lower at 0.53%.
VBND
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
CPLS
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VBND vs. CPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 0.55% | 7.31% | 1.26% | 1.49% |
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.53% | 6.91% | 1.65% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBND and CPLS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VBND and CPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBND vs. CPLS — Risk / Return Rank
VBND
CPLS
VBND vs. CPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBND | CPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.08 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.07 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 6.52 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBND | CPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.87 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
VBND vs. CPLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than CPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and CPLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBND | CPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -4.43% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.47% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -1.03% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -1.24% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 0.78% | +0.27% |
Volatility
VBND vs. CPLS - Volatility Comparison
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) at 1.42%. This indicates that VBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBND | CPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 1.42% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 2.88% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 3.87% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 4.82% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 4.82% | +0.63% |
VBND vs. CPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than CPLS's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBND vs. CPLS - Dividend Comparison
VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than CPLS's 4.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.61% | 4.66% | 4.71% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 4.22% | 4.22% | 4.41% | 3.88% | 2.55% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 3.12% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBND and CPLS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBND has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to CPLS (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs CPLS's -4.43%.
On 1-year performance, VBND leads with 6.14% vs 5.29% for CPLS. On fees, CPLS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VBND has performed better with a 6.14% return vs 5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CPLS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for VBND.
CPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 4.22% for VBND.
They also come from different issuers: Vident and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.33% for CPLS.
VBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBND and CPLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer