PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBND vs. BYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBND vs. BYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than BYLD's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VBND has underperformed BYLD with an annualized return of 1.58%, while BYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 3.01% annualized return.


VBND

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.57%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
0.41%
10Y*
1.58%

BYLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.35%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
3.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBND vs. BYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBND
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
0.39%7.31%1.26%8.16%-14.18%-0.43%5.37%9.50%-0.96%3.15%
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
1.23%8.41%4.17%8.30%-10.33%-1.25%4.25%12.79%-1.50%4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VBND and BYLD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2014

0.65

The correlation between VBND and BYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBND vs. BYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBND
VBND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BYLD
BYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBND vs. BYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBNDBYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.85

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

2.76

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.60

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.41

10.54

-5.12

VBND vs. BYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the BYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBND and BYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBNDBYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.85

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.43

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.56

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.57

-0.26

Drawdowns

VBND vs. BYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than BYLD's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and BYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBNDBYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-14.75%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.71%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.60%

-3.94%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.97%

-14.65%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.97%

-14.75%

-4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.34%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-2.51%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.67%

+0.38%

Volatility

VBND vs. BYLD - Volatility Comparison

Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) have volatilities of 1.49% and 1.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBNDBYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.42%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

2.94%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

3.82%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.12%

5.20%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

5.43%

+0.02%

VBND vs. BYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than BYLD's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBND vs. BYLD - Dividend Comparison

VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than BYLD's 5.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
5.36%5.32%5.31%4.45%3.39%2.18%3.41%3.67%4.22%3.22%3.14%3.37%
VBND
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
4.23%4.22%4.41%3.88%2.55%1.56%1.98%3.14%2.82%2.00%3.12%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBND and BYLD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBND has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to BYLD (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs BYLD's -14.75%.

On 10-year performance, BYLD leads with 3.01% vs 1.58% for VBND. On fees, BYLD is cheaper at 0.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BYLD has performed better with a 3.01% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BYLD is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for VBND.

BYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 4.23% for VBND.

VBND tracks Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index, while BYLD tracks Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.17% for BYLD.

BYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBND and BYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer