PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBMFX vs. DFLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBMFX vs. DFLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VBMFX) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBMFX achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than DFLVX's 18.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VBMFX has underperformed DFLVX with an annualized return of 1.18%, while DFLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.


VBMFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.76%
1Y
1.56%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
-0.55%
10Y*
1.18%
ALL TIME*
4.28%

DFLVX

1D
0.67%
1M
1.90%
6M
13.48%
YTD
18.84%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
11.93%
ALL TIME*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VBMFX vs. DFLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBMFX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Investor Shares
-0.76%7.05%1.15%5.62%-13.25%-2.04%7.63%8.61%-0.34%3.45%
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
18.84%16.36%12.76%11.52%-5.81%30.40%-0.58%25.46%-11.68%18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VBMFX and DFLVX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 1993

-0.12

The correlation between VBMFX and DFLVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBMFX vs. DFLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VBMFX
VBMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VBMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VBMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DFLVX
DFLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DFLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VBMFX vs. DFLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VBMFX) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBMFXDFLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.48

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

5.21

-4.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

19.82

-17.46

VBMFX vs. DFLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBMFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the DFLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBMFX and DFLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBMFX vs. DFLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBMFX drawdown since its inception was -19.08%, smaller than the maximum DFLVX drawdown of -65.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBMFX and DFLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBMFXDFLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.08%

-65.65%

+46.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-5.86%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

-16.64%

+11.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-19.83%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.08%

-41.79%

+22.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-0.70%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-8.44%

+5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.57%

-0.40%

Volatility

VBMFX vs. DFLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VBMFX) is 0.96%, while DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that VBMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBMFXDFLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

2.54%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

8.20%

-5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

11.23%

-7.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

15.77%

-9.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

18.29%

-13.32%

VBMFX vs. DFLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBMFX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFLVX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBMFX vs. DFLVX - Dividend Comparison

VBMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than DFLVX's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
1.43%1.71%1.87%3.65%4.56%5.90%1.97%4.04%7.83%6.06%3.77%6.52%
VBMFX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Investor Shares
3.61%3.76%3.57%2.99%2.49%1.72%2.31%2.63%2.47%2.45%2.43%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBMFX and DFLVX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFLVX has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to VBMFX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBMFX dropped -19.08% vs DFLVX's -65.65%.

DFLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBMFX and DFLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer