PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBMFX vs. DFIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBMFX vs. DFIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (VBMFX) and DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBMFX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than DFIHX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, VBMFX has underperformed DFIHX with an annualized return of 1.46%, while DFIHX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.


VBMFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.29%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
1.46%

DFIHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBMFX vs. DFIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBMFX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
0.38%7.05%1.15%5.62%-13.25%-2.04%7.63%8.61%-0.34%3.45%
DFIHX
DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio
1.52%3.41%5.41%4.98%-1.19%-0.19%0.62%2.44%1.87%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VBMFX and DFIHX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 1986

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between VBMFX and DFIHX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBMFX vs. DFIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBMFX
VBMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VBMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VBMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIHX
DFIHX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DFIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBMFX vs. DFIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (VBMFX) and DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBMFXDFIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

5.17

-3.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

8.94

-6.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

7.53

-6.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

9.49

-7.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.43

57.84

-52.41

VBMFX vs. DFIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the DFIHX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBMFX and DFIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBMFXDFIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

5.17

-3.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

2.78

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

2.50

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.52

-0.56

Drawdowns

VBMFX vs. DFIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBMFX drawdown since its inception was -19.08%, which is greater than DFIHX's maximum drawdown of -2.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBMFX and DFIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBMFXDFIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.08%

-2.53%

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-0.39%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.02%

-0.49%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-2.26%

-15.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.08%

-2.26%

-16.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

0.00%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-0.15%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.06%

+0.90%

Volatility

VBMFX vs. DFIHX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (VBMFX) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX) at 0.16%. This indicates that VBMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBMFXDFIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.16%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

0.43%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

0.72%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

1.00%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

0.80%

+4.18%

VBMFX vs. DFIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBMFX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIHX's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBMFX vs. DFIHX - Dividend Comparison

VBMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than DFIHX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIHX
DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio
3.58%3.26%4.99%3.37%1.07%0.00%0.62%2.12%1.85%1.13%0.66%0.51%
VBMFX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
3.87%3.76%3.57%2.99%2.49%1.72%2.31%2.63%2.47%2.45%2.43%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBMFX and DFIHX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBMFX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to DFIHX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBMFX dropped -19.08% vs DFIHX's -2.53%.

DFIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBMFX and DFIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer