PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBIPX vs. DFLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBIPX vs. DFLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIPX) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBIPX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than DFLVX's 14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VBIPX has underperformed DFLVX with an annualized return of 1.90%, while DFLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.


VBIPX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*
1.90%

DFLVX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.97%
YTD
14.74%
6M
17.76%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBIPX vs. DFLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBIPX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus
0.32%6.12%3.78%4.45%-5.68%-1.17%4.73%4.89%1.38%1.21%
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
14.74%16.36%12.76%11.52%-5.81%30.40%-0.58%25.46%-11.68%18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VBIPX and DFLVX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011

-0.15

The correlation between VBIPX and DFLVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBIPX vs. DFLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBIPX
VBIPX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VBIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DFLVX
DFLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBIPX vs. DFLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIPX) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBIPXDFLVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

3.09

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

4.37

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.55

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

5.59

-2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.79

20.61

-11.82

VBIPX vs. DFLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBIPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the DFLVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBIPX and DFLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBIPXDFLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

3.09

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.68

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.65

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.53

+0.26

Drawdowns

VBIPX vs. DFLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBIPX drawdown since its inception was -8.72%, smaller than the maximum DFLVX drawdown of -65.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBIPX and DFLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBIPXDFLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-65.65%

+56.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

-5.86%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.54%

-16.64%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.69%

-19.83%

+11.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.72%

-41.79%

+33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-8.48%

+7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

1.59%

-1.12%

Volatility

VBIPX vs. DFLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIPX) is 0.70%, while DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that VBIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBIPXDFLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

2.77%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

8.17%

-6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

11.00%

-8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

15.87%

-12.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.40%

18.38%

-15.98%

VBIPX vs. DFLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBIPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DFLVX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBIPX vs. DFLVX - Dividend Comparison

VBIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than DFLVX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
1.47%1.71%1.87%3.65%4.56%5.90%1.97%4.04%7.83%6.06%3.77%6.52%
VBIPX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus
4.02%3.86%3.40%2.01%1.40%1.26%1.82%2.27%2.04%1.69%1.53%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBIPX and DFLVX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFLVX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to VBIPX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBIPX dropped -8.72% vs DFLVX's -65.65%.

DFLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBIPX and DFLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer