PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCVX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCVX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Systematic Value Fund (VBCVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBCVX achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 16.67% return.


VBCVX

1D
0.52%
1M
3.97%
YTD
14.87%
6M
13.84%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
10.81%

FLCOX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.43%
YTD
16.67%
6M
15.94%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCVX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBCVX
VALIC Company I Systematic Value Fund
14.87%10.37%16.75%11.06%-6.57%31.26%-2.16%23.66%-17.02%18.17%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
16.67%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VBCVX and FLCOX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.97

The correlation between VBCVX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCVX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBCVX
VBCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VBCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VBCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCVX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Systematic Value Fund (VBCVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBCVXFLCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.49

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.55

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

18.96

-1.91

VBCVX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBCVX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBCVX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCVX drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, which is greater than FLCOX's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCVX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCVXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.88%

-38.28%

-20.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-6.80%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.90%

-15.60%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-19.00%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.08%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-4.43%

-6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.63%

+0.03%

Volatility

VBCVX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

VALIC Company I Systematic Value Fund (VBCVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCVXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.98%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

8.65%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

11.27%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

14.86%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

17.63%

-0.01%

VBCVX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCVX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBCVX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

VBCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, more than FLCOX's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.30%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%
VBCVX
VALIC Company I Systematic Value Fund
8.05%0.00%1.61%7.29%4.41%19.32%13.79%10.74%1.92%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VBCVX and FLCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCOX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to VBCVX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBCVX dropped -58.88% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCVX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer