VBCH vs. BSCQ
VBCH (Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - VBCH tracks the ICE 2034 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index while BSCQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VBCH charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
VBCH vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCH
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.03M | $15.67M | $16.70M | |
| $105.55K | $286.07K | $238.96K |
VBCH vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCH Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.32% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCH and BSCQ is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCH vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
VBCH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSCQ
VBCH vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCH) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCH | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 41.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 186.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCH vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCH drawdown since its inception was -2.05%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCH and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCH | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -16.50% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | 0.00% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -2.80% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
VBCH vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCH | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.65% | 0.60% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 3.28% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 4.73% | -0.08% |
VBCH vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCH vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
VBCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than BSCQ's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
VBCH Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCH and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 1.33% for VBCH.
VBCH tracks ICE 2034 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCH and 0.10% for BSCQ.
Find the right allocation for VBCH and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer