VBCG vs. VXUS
VBCG (Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2033 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBCG charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
VBCG vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCG
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
VBCG vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.02% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCG and VXUS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCG vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
VBCG
VXUS
VBCG vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.37 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
VBCG vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCG drawdown since its inception was -1.90%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCG and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -35.97% | +34.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -4.52% | +3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -8.21% | +7.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility
VBCG vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 15.67% | -11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 16.12% | -11.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 17.19% | -12.61% |
VBCG vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCG vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
VBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than VXUS's 2.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.75% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCG and VXUS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCG.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.84% for VBCG.
VBCG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VXUS is Global Equities. VBCG tracks ICE 2033 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCG and 0.05% for VXUS.
Find the right allocation for VBCG and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer