VBCG vs. VCLT
VBCG (Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from Vanguard - VBCG tracks the ICE 2033 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index while VCLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBCG charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
VBCG vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- -2.82%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
VBCG vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.11% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCG and VCLT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCG vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
VBCG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VCLT
VBCG vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCG vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCG drawdown since its inception was -1.90%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCG and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -34.31% | +32.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -15.54% | +14.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -8.19% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility
VBCG vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 7.81% | -3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 12.76% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 12.84% | -8.49% |
VBCG vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCG vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
VBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than VCLT's 5.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.65% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, VBCG and VCLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCG.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 1.20% for VBCG.
VBCG tracks ICE 2033 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCG and 0.03% for VCLT.
Find the right allocation for VBCG and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer