VBCG vs. OVT
VBCG (Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF) and OVT (Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. VBCG is passively managed, while OVT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBCG charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for OVT.
Performance
VBCG vs. OVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCG
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OVT
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 8.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
VBCG vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.02% |
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCG and OVT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCG vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank
VBCG
OVT
VBCG vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCG | OVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.65 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
VBCG vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCG drawdown since its inception was -1.90%, smaller than the maximum OVT drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCG and OVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCG | OVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -13.59% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -1.12% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -3.38% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.45% | — |
Volatility
VBCG vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCG | OVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 3.57% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 4.65% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 4.55% | +0.03% |
VBCG vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBCG vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison
VBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than OVT's 8.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF | 8.23% | 7.21% | 6.15% | 5.11% | 4.12% | 4.41% |
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCG and OVT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCG is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCG is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.
OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.23%, compared with 0.84% for VBCG.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCG and 0.80% for OVT.
Find the right allocation for VBCG and OVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer