VBCD vs. BND
VBCD (Vanguard Target Maturity 2030 Corporate Bond ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2030 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBCD charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
VBCD vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
VBCD vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCD Vanguard Target Maturity 2030 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.81% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCD and BND is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCD vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
VBCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BND
VBCD vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCD) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCD vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCD drawdown since its inception was -1.23%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCD and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -18.58% | +17.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -2.43% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -3.06% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility
VBCD vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 3.72% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.02% | 6.03% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.02% | 5.53% | -2.51% |
VBCD vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCD has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCD vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
VBCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than BND's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 4.00% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
VBCD Vanguard Target Maturity 2030 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VBCD and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCD.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 0.83% for VBCD.
VBCD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. VBCD tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCD and 0.03% for BND.
Find the right allocation for VBCD and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer