VBCC vs. VCLT
VBCC (Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from Vanguard - VBCC tracks the ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index while VCLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VBCC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
VBCC vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCC
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- 6M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -0.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- -3.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $576.39K | $637.25K | $642.30K | |
| $269.99M | $266.96M | $358.04M |
VBCC vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCC Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.01% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | -1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCC and VCLT is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCC vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
VBCC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VCLT
VBCC vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCC) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCC | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCC vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCC drawdown since its inception was -0.79%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCC and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCC | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -34.31% | +33.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -17.30% | +17.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -8.22% | +7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.43% | — |
Volatility
VBCC vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCC | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19% | 7.78% | -5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 12.75% | -10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 12.83% | -10.64% |
VBCC vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCC vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
VBCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VCLT's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCC Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.18% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCC and VCLT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCC.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 0.79% for VBCC.
VBCC tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCC and 0.03% for VCLT.
Find the right allocation for VBCC and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer