VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO
VBAL.TO (Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio) and XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBAL.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Vanguard, while XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. VBAL.TO is actively managed, while XEG.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VBAL.TO returned 7.41%/yr vs 31.50%/yr for XEG.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBAL.TO charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XEG.TO.
Performance
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBAL.TO achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 41.24% return.
VBAL.TO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.68%
XEG.TO
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 34.92%
- YTD
- 41.24%
- 1Y
- 62.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- 31.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.52%
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBAL.TO Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio | 8.43% | 11.92% | 14.62% | 12.49% | -11.39% | 10.21% | 10.27% | 14.90% | -3.35% |
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 41.24% | 16.72% | 14.04% | 3.55% | 53.25% | 83.71% | -34.44% | 9.04% | -23.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBAL.TO and XEG.TO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018 | 0.31 |
The correlation between VBAL.TO and XEG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VBAL.TO
XEG.TO
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBAL.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.82 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 11.60 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.19%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBAL.TO and XEG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBAL.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.19% | -87.51% | +66.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -16.47% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.66% | -25.67% | +16.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | -28.42% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -6.07% | +4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -34.53% | +31.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 5.42% | -3.98% |
Volatility
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) is 2.17%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that VBAL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBAL.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 7.57% | -5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | 19.89% | -12.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 24.02% | -15.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.74% | 28.57% | -19.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 33.42% | -23.34% |
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBAL.TO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison
VBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than XEG.TO's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBAL.TO Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio | 2.12% | 2.23% | 2.30% | 2.37% | 2.21% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 2.61% | 3.63% | 3.46% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 1.64% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.25% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 3.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBAL.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.
VBAL.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for VBAL.TO and 0.60% for XEG.TO.
Find the right allocation for VBAL.TO and XEG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer