PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBAL.TO achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 41.24% return.


VBAL.TO

1D
0.84%
1M
-0.90%
6M
6.95%
YTD
8.43%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.68%

XEG.TO

1D
2.21%
1M
9.71%
6M
34.92%
YTD
41.24%
1Y
62.67%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
31.50%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
8.43%11.92%14.62%12.49%-11.39%10.21%10.27%14.90%-3.35%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
41.24%16.72%14.04%3.55%53.25%83.71%-34.44%9.04%-23.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VBAL.TO and XEG.TO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018

0.31

The correlation between VBAL.TO and XEG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBAL.TO
VBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBAL.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.82

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

11.60

-0.76

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBAL.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.19%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBAL.TO and XEG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBAL.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-87.51%

+66.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-16.47%

+10.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.66%

-25.67%

+16.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-28.42%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-6.07%

+4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-34.53%

+31.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

5.42%

-3.98%

Volatility

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) is 2.17%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that VBAL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBAL.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

7.57%

-5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

19.89%

-12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

24.02%

-15.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.74%

28.57%

-19.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.08%

33.42%

-23.34%

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBAL.TO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBAL.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

VBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than XEG.TO's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.12%2.23%2.30%2.37%2.21%1.95%1.82%2.25%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.61%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBAL.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.

VBAL.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for VBAL.TO and 0.60% for XEG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBAL.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer