PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBAL.TO achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than TGRO.TO's 9.93% return.


VBAL.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
4.26%
YTD
8.13%
6M
6.49%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*

TGRO.TO

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.81%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
8.13%11.88%14.56%12.43%-11.44%10.16%5.90%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
9.93%18.03%22.28%18.36%-11.39%20.46%2,565.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VBAL.TO and TGRO.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020

0.86

The correlation between VBAL.TO and TGRO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBAL.TO
VBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBAL.TOTGRO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.49

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.56

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.17

15.71

-2.54

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBAL.TO and TGRO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBAL.TOTGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.58

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

1.14

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.10

+0.68

Drawdowns

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.19%, which is greater than TGRO.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBAL.TO and TGRO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBAL.TOTGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-18.37%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-7.21%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.68%

-13.27%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.45%

-18.37%

+1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.41%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-3.46%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.63%

-0.24%

Volatility

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) is 2.73%, while TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that VBAL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBAL.TOTGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

3.28%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

8.10%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

9.93%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.63%

11.69%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.09%

995.08%

-984.99%

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBAL.TO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRO.TO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBAL.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

VBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than TGRO.TO's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
1.78%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%0.00%0.00%
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.05%2.21%2.26%2.32%2.16%1.91%1.79%2.20%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VBAL.TO and TGRO.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for VBAL.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for VBAL.TO and 0.15% for TGRO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBAL.TO and TGRO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer