PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBAL.TO achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than PYF.TO's 1.16% return.


VBAL.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
4.26%
YTD
8.13%
6M
6.49%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*

PYF.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.79%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.28%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
8.13%11.88%14.56%12.43%-11.44%10.16%10.23%14.85%-2.87%
PYF.TO
Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF
1.16%5.45%7.42%8.40%5.25%4.95%-1.59%7.28%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VBAL.TO and PYF.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018

0.48

The correlation between VBAL.TO and PYF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBAL.TO
PYF.TO

Financial Services

20.6%
17.0%

Technology

20.4%
23.1%

Industrials

11.6%
3.1%

Energy

8.6%
3.8%

Basic Materials

8.5%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
21.8%

Healthcare

6.7%
14.5%

Communication Services

6.1%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
11.9%

Utilities

2.8%
0.0%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.0%

Financial Services

VBAL.TO
20.6%
PYF.TO
17.0%

Technology

VBAL.TO
20.4%
PYF.TO
23.1%

Industrials

VBAL.TO
11.6%
PYF.TO
3.1%

Energy

VBAL.TO
8.6%
PYF.TO
3.8%

Basic Materials

VBAL.TO
8.5%
PYF.TO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VBAL.TO
7.9%
PYF.TO
21.8%

Healthcare

VBAL.TO
6.7%
PYF.TO
14.5%

Communication Services

VBAL.TO
6.1%
PYF.TO
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

VBAL.TO
4.6%
PYF.TO
11.9%

Utilities

VBAL.TO
2.8%
PYF.TO
0.0%

Real Estate

VBAL.TO
2.3%
PYF.TO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBAL.TO
VBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PYF.TO
PYF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PYF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBAL.TOPYF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.14

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.05

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.17

2.83

+10.34

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the PYF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBAL.TO and PYF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBAL.TOPYF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

0.71

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

1.16

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.71

+0.07

Drawdowns

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.19%, roughly equal to the maximum PYF.TO drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBAL.TO and PYF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBAL.TOPYF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-20.53%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-2.11%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.68%

-5.57%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.45%

-5.57%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.42%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-0.98%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

0.79%

+0.60%

Volatility

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO) at 1.18%. This indicates that VBAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBAL.TOPYF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

1.18%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

2.29%

+4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

3.20%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.63%

5.19%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.09%

6.67%

+3.42%

Dividends

VBAL.TO vs. PYF.TO - Dividend Comparison

VBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than PYF.TO's 7.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PYF.TO
Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF
7.36%7.84%7.66%7.47%5.78%5.74%5.69%5.29%5.38%5.83%6.59%
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.05%2.21%2.26%2.32%2.16%1.91%1.79%2.20%1.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBAL.TO and PYF.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Purpose Investments.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBAL.TO and PYF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer