PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBAL.TO achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than CM.TO's 28.60% return.


VBAL.TO

1D
0.48%
1M
2.81%
YTD
7.94%
6M
7.00%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*

CM.TO

1D
1.70%
1M
3.50%
YTD
28.60%
6M
26.24%
1Y
77.57%
3Y*
47.25%
5Y*
23.85%
10Y*
21.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
7.94%11.92%14.62%12.49%-11.39%10.21%10.27%14.90%-3.35%
CM.TO
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
28.60%42.31%49.56%23.83%-20.89%47.75%13.88%18.19%-8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VBAL.TO and CM.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018

0.51

The correlation between VBAL.TO and CM.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBAL.TO
VBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CM.TO
CM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBAL.TOCM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.75

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

8.50

-5.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.36

31.13

-18.77

VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the CM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBAL.TO and CM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.19%, smaller than the maximum CM.TO drawdown of -58.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBAL.TO and CM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBAL.TOCM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-58.49%

+37.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-9.11%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.66%

-16.57%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-35.43%

+19.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-1.28%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-9.29%

+6.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

2.48%

-1.06%

Volatility

VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) is 3.41%, while Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that VBAL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBAL.TOCM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

7.93%

-4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

14.93%

-7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.33%

17.59%

-9.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.70%

18.23%

-9.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.11%

19.92%

-9.81%

Dividends

VBAL.TO vs. CM.TO - Dividend Comparison

VBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than CM.TO's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CM.TO
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.57%3.20%4.04%5.47%7.52%8.13%10.74%10.51%10.58%8.39%8.84%9.69%
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.07%2.23%2.30%2.37%2.21%1.95%1.82%2.25%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBAL.TO and CM.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBAL.TO and CM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer