PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAW vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAW vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 13.71% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 10.56%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.


VAW

1D
1.79%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
13.71%
6M
14.42%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
10.56%

VHT

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.39%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.45%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAW vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
13.71%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-0.11%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VAW and VHT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.61

The correlation between VAW and VHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAW vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAW
VHT

Basic Materials

90.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%

-

Industrials

1.0%
0.0%

Energy

0.5%

-

Healthcare

0.5%
100.0%

Technology

0.1%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

VAW
90.2%
VHT

-

Consumer Cyclical

VAW
8.3%
VHT

-

Industrials

VAW
1.0%
VHT
0.0%

Energy

VAW
0.5%
VHT

-

Healthcare

VAW
0.5%
VHT
100.0%

Technology

VAW
0.1%
VHT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VAW
0.0%
VHT

-

Communication Services

VAW

-

VHT

-

Financial Services

VAW

-

VHT
0.0%

Real Estate

VAW

-

VHT

-

Utilities

VAW

-

VHT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAW vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAW vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAWVHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.53

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

3.81

+1.49

VAW vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAW and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAW vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAWVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.17%

-39.12%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-10.40%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-16.91%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-17.71%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-28.85%

-12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-3.28%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-5.99%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

4.19%

+0.01%

Volatility

VAW vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.88%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAWVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

4.88%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

10.46%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.45%

14.70%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.76%

15.01%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

16.97%

+4.29%

VAW vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAW vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VHT's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.36%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.64%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAW and VHT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAW has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VHT's -39.12%.

On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 10.56% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.36% for VAW.

VAW is categorized as Materials, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAW and 0.09% for VHT.

VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAW and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer