VAW vs. VHT
VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAW returned 10.56%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VHT. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VAW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
VAW vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 13.71% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 10.56%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.
VAW
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VAW vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 13.71% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAW and VHT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VAW and VHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VAW vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAW
VHT
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
VAW
VHT
-
Consumer Cyclical
VAW
VHT
-
Industrials
VAW
VHT
Energy
VAW
VHT
-
Healthcare
VAW
VHT
Technology
VAW
VHT
Consumer Defensive
VAW
VHT
-
Communication Services
VAW
-
VHT
-
Financial Services
VAW
-
VHT
Real Estate
VAW
-
VHT
-
Utilities
VAW
-
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAW vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
VAW
VHT
VAW vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VAW | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.53 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 3.81 | +1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VAW vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAW | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -39.12% | -23.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -10.40% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.21% | -16.91% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -17.71% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | -28.85% | -12.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -3.28% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -5.99% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 4.19% | +0.01% |
Volatility
VAW vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.88%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAW | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 4.88% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 10.46% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 14.70% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 15.01% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 16.97% | +4.29% |
VAW vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAW vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VHT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAW and VHT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VAW has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 10.56% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.36% for VAW.
VAW is categorized as Materials, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAW and 0.09% for VHT.
VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VAW and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer