VAW vs. VDC
VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAW returned 10.46%/yr vs 7.94%/yr for VDC. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
VAW vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly higher than VDC's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 10.46%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.
VAW
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
VDC
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
VAW vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 11.07% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 8.86% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAW and VDC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VAW and VDC has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VAW vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAW
VDC
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
VAW
VDC
Consumer Cyclical
VAW
VDC
Industrials
VAW
VDC
Healthcare
VAW
VDC
Technology
VAW
VDC
-
Consumer Defensive
VAW
VDC
Energy
VAW
VDC
-
Communication Services
VAW
-
VDC
-
Financial Services
VAW
-
VDC
-
Real Estate
VAW
-
VDC
-
Utilities
VAW
-
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAW vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
VAW
VDC
VAW vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VAW | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.08 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 0.60 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 1.20 | +3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VAW vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAW | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -34.24% | -27.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -9.28% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.21% | -11.78% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -16.55% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | -25.31% | -15.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.58% | -5.83% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -3.73% | -5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 4.67% | -0.44% |
Volatility
VAW vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 5.04%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAW | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 5.04% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.86% | 10.34% | +4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 12.79% | +5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 13.20% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 14.68% | +6.55% |
VAW vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VAW and VDC have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAW vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than VDC's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.39% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.11% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAW and VDC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VAW has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to VDC (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 10.46% vs 7.94% for VDC. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VAW and VDC have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.39% for VAW.
VAW is categorized as Materials, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index.
VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VAW and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer