VAW vs. FSCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX).
VAW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. FSCHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 28, 1985.
Performance
VAW vs. FSCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VAW vs. FSCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 8.97% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
FSCHX Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio | 15.94% | -8.85% | -6.17% | 12.80% | -13.81% | 31.95% | 17.52% | 8.30% | -22.30% | 31.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than FSCHX's 15.94% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has outperformed FSCHX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while FSCHX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.64% annualized return.
VAW
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -7.36%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
FSCHX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VAW vs. FSCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FSCHX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VAW vs. FSCHX — Risk / Return Rank
VAW
FSCHX
VAW vs. FSCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAW | FSCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.39 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 0.70 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.09 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.41 | +1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 0.99 | +4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAW | FSCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.39 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.14 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.30 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between VAW and FSCHX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VAW vs. FSCHX - Dividend Comparison
VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than FSCHX's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
FSCHX Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio | 1.92% | 2.23% | 8.27% | 6.33% | 11.44% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 6.97% | 15.01% | 8.05% | 4.75% | 6.58% |
Drawdowns
VAW vs. FSCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, roughly equal to the maximum FSCHX drawdown of -59.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and FSCHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAW | FSCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -59.24% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.33% | -15.47% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -27.38% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | -51.75% | +10.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.36% | -8.80% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -8.89% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 6.38% | -2.23% |
Volatility
VAW vs. FSCHX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX) at 5.80%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VAW | FSCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 5.80% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 12.14% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 21.35% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 20.03% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 22.42% | -1.28% |