VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and RQFI.L (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - VAPX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while RQFI.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.L returned 10.62%/yr vs 4.84%/yr for RQFI.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAPX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RQFI.L.

Performance

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VAPX.L is traded in GBP, while RQFI.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RQFI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 35.34% return, which is significantly higher than RQFI.L's 6.78% return. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.L has outperformed RQFI.L with an annualized return of 10.62%, while RQFI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.

VAPX.L

• 1D: -2.32%
• 1M: -10.95%
• 6M: 28.36%
• YTD: 35.34%
• 1Y: 56.97%
• 3Y*: 21.60%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

RQFI.L

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -2.49%
• 6M: 4.42%
• YTD: 6.78%
• 1Y: 27.80%
• 3Y*: 9.85%
• 5Y*: -0.10%
• 10Y*: 4.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing	35.34%	31.34%	-3.50%	3.89%	-1.65%	1.83%	15.31%	12.85%	-9.57%	20.38%
RQFI.L Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D	6.78%	18.47%	15.24%	-18.06%	-18.37%	-0.46%	33.54%	29.73%	-23.62%	20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VAPX.L and RQFI.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014	0.48

The correlation between VAPX.L and RQFI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.50 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VAPX.L	RQFI.L
Technology	39.9%	26.3%
Financial Services	21.4%	20.4%
Industrials	10.4%	16.6%
Basic Materials	8.9%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	6.7%
Real Estate	4.2%	0.5%
Healthcare	2.6%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	7.4%
Communication Services	2.0%	0.8%
Energy	1.8%	2.8%
Utilities	1.6%	3.0%

Return for Risk

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAPX.L

VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

RQFI.L

RQFI.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
RQFI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RQFI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RQFI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RQFI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RQFI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VAPX.L	RQFI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.65	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.26	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.29	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.81	3.40	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.19	10.50	+1.69

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the RQFI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAPX.L and RQFI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, smaller than the maximum RQFI.L drawdown of -47.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and RQFI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VAPX.L	RQFI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.88%	-47.55%	+16.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.89%	-8.13%	-6.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.81%	-25.09%	+8.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.55%	-41.72%	+24.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.88%	-46.36%	+15.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.89%	-14.24%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.32%	-24.67%	+18.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	2.64%	+2.02%

Volatility

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a higher volatility of 14.28% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.L) at 7.94%. This indicates that VAPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RQFI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VAPX.L	RQFI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.28%	7.94%	+6.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.12%	12.27%	+11.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.75%	16.79%	+8.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	20.87%	-3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	21.72%	-3.69%

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RQFI.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

VAPX.L vs. RQFI.L - Dividend Comparison

VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than RQFI.L's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RQFI.L Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D	1.48%	1.77%	1.46%	1.99%	1.88%	0.93%	1.26%	0.76%	2.23%	1.92%	1.69%	0.37%
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing	2.04%	2.70%	3.47%	3.53%	4.32%	3.51%	2.08%	3.39%	3.52%	3.10%	2.71%	3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VAPX.L and RQFI.L in my portfolio?

VAPX.L and RQFI.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VAPX.L or RQFI.L?

On fees, VAPX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VAPX.L or RQFI.L?

VAPX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.L.

What is the main difference between VAPX.L and RQFI.L?

VAPX.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RQFI.L is China Equities. VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while RQFI.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.L and 0.65% for RQFI.L.