VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L
VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and HKOR.L (HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - VAPX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD while HKOR.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.L returned 12.84%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for HKOR.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VAPX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HKOR.L.
Performance
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VAPX.L is traded in GBP, while HKOR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HKOR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 48.85% return, which is significantly lower than HKOR.L's 107.38% return. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.L has underperformed HKOR.L with an annualized return of 12.84%, while HKOR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.97% annualized return.
VAPX.L
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 48.85%
- 6M
- 53.84%
- 1Y
- 83.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
HKOR.L
- 1D
- -4.88%
- 1M
- 17.29%
- YTD
- 107.38%
- 6M
- 126.00%
- 1Y
- 237.99%
- 3Y*
- 45.20%
- 5Y*
- 19.90%
- 10Y*
- 17.97%
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 48.85% | 30.80% | -3.74% | 3.63% | -1.84% | 1.30% | 14.91% | 12.74% | -9.53% | 20.31% |
HKOR.L HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD | 107.38% | 86.42% | -21.81% | 13.46% | -19.95% | -7.35% | 40.21% | 7.12% | -16.48% | 32.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAPX.L and HKOR.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VAPX.L and HKOR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Financial Services
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Industrials
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Basic Materials
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Consumer Cyclical
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Real Estate
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
-
Healthcare
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Consumer Defensive
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Communication Services
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Energy
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Utilities
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank
VAPX.L
HKOR.L
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAPX.L | HKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.84 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.18 | 11.12 | -4.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.27 | 39.48 | -16.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAPX.L | HKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11 | 6.39 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.79 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.50 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, smaller than the maximum HKOR.L drawdown of -44.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and HKOR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAPX.L | HKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.88% | -44.41% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.47% | -21.26% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.88% | -29.09% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -40.86% | +22.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.88% | -44.41% | +13.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -5.40% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -15.72% | +9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 6.00% | -2.42% |
Volatility
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) is 10.22%, while HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that VAPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAPX.L | HKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 17.73% | -7.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 32.16% | -14.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 37.01% | -16.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 25.32% | -9.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 24.24% | -6.85% |
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HKOR.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VAPX.L vs. HKOR.L - Dividend Comparison
VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than HKOR.L's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKOR.L HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD | 0.35% | 0.69% | 1.51% | 1.11% | 0.71% | 0.59% | 0.02% | 0.29% | 0.53% | 0.11% | 0.13% | 0.57% |
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.54% | 2.36% | 3.20% | 3.30% | 4.12% | 2.99% | 1.81% | 3.28% | 3.55% | 3.07% | 2.71% | 3.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAPX.L and HKOR.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VAPX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VAPX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOR.L.
VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while HKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.L and 0.50% for HKOR.L.
Find the right allocation for VAPX.L and HKOR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer