VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L
VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and FLRK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - VAPX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD while FLRK.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VAPX.L returned 12.69%/yr vs 20.63%/yr for FLRK.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VAPX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLRK.L.
Performance
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 48.85% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 111.17% return.
VAPX.L
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 48.85%
- 6M
- 53.84%
- 1Y
- 83.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
FLRK.L
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- 19.12%
- YTD
- 111.17%
- 6M
- 129.46%
- 1Y
- 234.17%
- 3Y*
- 46.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.63%
- 10Y*
- —
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 48.85% | 30.80% | -3.74% | 3.63% | -1.84% | 1.30% | 14.91% | 4.38% |
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 111.17% | 82.09% | -20.56% | 14.16% | -19.37% | -5.90% | 42.60% | -14.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAPX.L and FLRK.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VAPX.L and FLRK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Financial Services
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Industrials
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Basic Materials
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Consumer Cyclical
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Real Estate
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
-
Healthcare
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Consumer Defensive
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Communication Services
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Energy
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Utilities
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank
VAPX.L
FLRK.L
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAPX.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.85 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.18 | 10.98 | -4.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.27 | 39.30 | -16.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAPX.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11 | 6.24 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.81 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.67 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, smaller than the maximum FLRK.L drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and FLRK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAPX.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.88% | -41.57% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.47% | -21.18% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.88% | -27.82% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -38.68% | +20.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -5.62% | +2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -19.95% | +13.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 5.93% | -2.35% |
Volatility
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) is 10.22%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that VAPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAPX.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 18.09% | -7.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 32.92% | -15.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 37.31% | -17.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 25.31% | -9.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 27.31% | -9.92% |
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAPX.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison
VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while FLRK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.54% | 2.36% | 3.20% | 3.30% | 4.12% | 2.99% | 1.81% | 3.28% | 3.55% | 3.07% | 2.71% | 3.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAPX.L and FLRK.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VAPX.L.
VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.L and 0.09% for FLRK.L.
Find the right allocation for VAPX.L and FLRK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer