VALT-U.TO vs. CCOM.TO
VALT-U.TO (CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series)) and CCOM.TO (CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - VALT-U.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by CI, while CCOM.TO is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index. VALT-U.TO is actively managed, while CCOM.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VALT-U.TO returned 28.29%/yr vs 3.81%/yr for CCOM.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VALT-U.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VALT-U.TO is traded in USD, while CCOM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CCOM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALT-U.TO achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly lower than CCOM.TO's 6.49% return.
VALT-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -7.30%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- —
CCOM.TO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 15.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VALT-U.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALT-U.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) | -6.39% | 65.42% | 26.27% | 13.43% | 10.37% |
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 6.49% | 12.08% | -2.37% | -0.08% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALT-U.TO and CCOM.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALT-U.TO vs. CCOM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VALT-U.TO
CCOM.TO
VALT-U.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VALT-U.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 1.36 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 4.57 | -2.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VALT-U.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALT-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than CCOM.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALT-U.TO and CCOM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALT-U.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -11.35% | -27.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.65% | -11.13% | -27.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.65% | -11.13% | -27.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.72% | -10.95% | -26.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -4.86% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.30% | 3.31% | +10.99% |
Volatility
VALT-U.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) at 2.78%. This indicates that VALT-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALT-U.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 2.78% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.00% | 9.37% | +29.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.49% | 11.62% | +29.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 10.80% | +12.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 10.80% | +11.59% |
Dividends
VALT-U.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Dividend Comparison
VALT-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 13.61% | 3.48% | 6.99% | 4.21% |
VALT-U.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VALT-U.TO and CCOM.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VALT-U.TO is categorized as Gold, while CCOM.TO is Commodities.
Find the right allocation for VALT-U.TO and CCOM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer