VALN vs. MU
VALN (Valneva SE) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. VALN operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, VALN returned -29.20%/yr vs 66.92%/yr for MU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VALN vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALN achieves a -44.44% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 236.37% return.
VALN
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- 6M
- -50.60%
- YTD
- -44.44%
- 1Y
- -21.35%
- 3Y*
- -31.49%
- 5Y*
- -29.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -27.61%
MU
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -20.78%
- 6M
- 146.72%
- YTD
- 236.37%
- 1Y
- 779.89%
- 3Y*
- 145.40%
- 5Y*
- 66.92%
- 10Y*
- 53.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.95B | $51.51B | $46.64B | |
VALN Valneva SE | $177.83K | $152.71K | $189.08K |
VALN vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALN Valneva SE | -44.44% | 101.74% | -57.84% | -18.48% | -77.09% | 110.19% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 236.37% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALN and MU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
VALN:
$464.63M
MU:
$1.08T
VALN:
-€1.61
MU:
$44.42
VALN:
2.36
MU:
12.08
VALN:
4.81
MU:
10.88
VALN:
€156.84M
MU:
$90.27B
VALN:
€46.13M
MU:
$65.51B
VALN:
-€91.00M
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALN vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
VALN
MU
VALN vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valneva SE (VALN) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VALN | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.71 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 26.01 | -26.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 86.18 | -86.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VALN vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALN drawdown since its inception was -94.52%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALN and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALN | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.52% | -98.25% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.33% | -30.28% | -30.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.87% | -57.63% | -18.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.52% | -57.63% | -36.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.72% | -20.92% | -71.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.75% | -58.04% | -15.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.34% | 9.12% | +26.22% |
Volatility
VALN vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Valneva SE (VALN) is 10.61%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.15%. This indicates that VALN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALN | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.61% | 31.15% | -20.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.78% | 63.72% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.07% | 77.22% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.99% | 55.26% | +38.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.71% | 50.91% | +41.80% |
Dividends
VALN vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
VALN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
VALN Valneva SE | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VALN vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Valneva SE and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
VALN and MU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.15%) compared to VALN (10.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALN dropped -94.52% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.22 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VALN and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer