PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF (VALD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VALD.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
1.88%
YTD
10.40%
6M
13.48%
1Y
18.73%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*

ASRM.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VALD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF
10.40%23.55%9.24%14.99%-19.44%23.32%-12.12%17.75%-12.42%14.18%
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%-78.40%-3.99%-3.83%0.89%-16.42%-14.47%3.07%-5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VALD.DE and ASRM.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2017

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALD.DE
VALD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VALD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VALD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRM.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF (VALD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VALD.DEASRM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALD.DEASRM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

Drawdowns

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALD.DEASRM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

Volatility

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALD.DEASRM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ASRM.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VALD.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Dividend Comparison

VALD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, while ASRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VALD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF
3.00%3.36%3.35%3.36%3.99%2.17%5.02%4.92%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


VALD.DE and ASRM.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VALD.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALD.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ASRM.DE.

VALD.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while ASRM.DE is REIT. VALD.DE tracks BNP Paribas Value Europe ESG, while ASRM.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VALD.DE and 0.40% for ASRM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALD.DE and ASRM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer