PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALAX vs. EATVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALAX vs. EATVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Al Frank Fund (VALAX) and Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALAX achieves a 25.18% return, which is significantly higher than EATVX's 19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VALAX has outperformed EATVX with an annualized return of 15.04%, while EATVX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.


VALAX

1D
0.85%
1M
4.45%
YTD
25.18%
6M
23.99%
1Y
50.76%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
15.04%

EATVX

1D
0.98%
1M
5.30%
YTD
19.96%
6M
19.30%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALAX vs. EATVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
25.18%23.57%13.35%14.05%-13.50%24.97%10.22%33.98%-7.87%18.09%
EATVX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund
19.96%12.86%14.37%9.44%-9.77%25.92%4.39%29.73%-5.98%17.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VALAX and EATVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.93

The correlation between VALAX and EATVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALAX vs. EATVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALAX
VALAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

EATVX
EATVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EATVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EATVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
EATVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EATVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EATVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALAX vs. EATVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Al Frank Fund (VALAX) and Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VALAXEATVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.52

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.08

4.35

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.87

18.62

+5.25

VALAX vs. EATVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is comparable to the EATVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALAX and EATVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VALAX vs. EATVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALAX drawdown since its inception was -61.26%, which is greater than EATVX's maximum drawdown of -53.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALAX and EATVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALAXEATVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.26%

-53.01%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-8.03%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.81%

-18.74%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-20.70%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

-38.63%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-8.17%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.87%

+0.31%

Volatility

VALAX vs. EATVX - Volatility Comparison

Al Frank Fund (VALAX) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) at 4.52%. This indicates that VALAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EATVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALAXEATVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

4.52%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

9.52%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

12.16%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

15.19%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

17.59%

+1.80%

VALAX vs. EATVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than EATVX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

VALAX vs. EATVX - Dividend Comparison

VALAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than EATVX's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EATVX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund
3.47%4.16%3.75%3.24%2.17%4.50%1.29%1.13%1.57%0.95%1.10%8.71%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
6.91%8.65%10.32%5.95%8.62%6.83%7.17%13.51%10.73%10.66%5.32%9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VALAX and EATVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VALAX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to EATVX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALAX dropped -61.26% vs EATVX's -53.01%.

VALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALAX and EATVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer