PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating (VAGU.L) and Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGU.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than FLUC.L's -0.38% return.


VAGU.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.52%
6M
0.30%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*

FLUC.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.38%
6M
-0.09%
YTD
-0.38%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VAGU.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating
0.37%4.95%2.72%6.90%-12.61%-2.00%5.90%3.01%
FLUC.L
Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.38%7.46%2.08%7.77%-15.53%-2.24%9.76%6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGU.L and FLUC.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.75

The correlation between VAGU.L and FLUC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGU.L
VAGU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VAGU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FLUC.L
FLUC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FLUC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating (VAGU.L) and Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAGU.LFLUC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.59

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.98

4.39

-1.41

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the FLUC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGU.L and FLUC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum FLUC.L drawdown of -22.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGU.L and FLUC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAGU.LFLUC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-22.30%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-2.61%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.78%

-6.03%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.10%

-22.12%

+5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-2.74%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-6.53%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.95%

+0.11%

Volatility

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating (VAGU.L) is 1.06%, while Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that VAGU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLUC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAGU.LFLUC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.37%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

3.75%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

4.93%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.19%

6.76%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.77%

7.08%

-2.31%

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLUC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VAGU.L vs. FLUC.L - Dividend Comparison

VAGU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLUC.L
Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.22%4.01%4.26%3.38%2.76%2.17%2.29%3.37%1.61%
VAGU.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAGU.L and FLUC.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLUC.L.

VAGU.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while FLUC.L is Corporate Bonds. VAGU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted and Scaled Index in USD, while FLUC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate - Investment Grade Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGU.L and 0.35% for FLUC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAGU.L and FLUC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer