VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VAGS.L (Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating) and VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VAGS.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while VJPB.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VAGS.L returned 1.46%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for VJPB.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAGS.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPB.L.

Performance

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than VJPB.L's 15.28% return.

VAGS.L

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 3.27%
• 3Y*: 6.03%
• 5Y*: 1.46%
• 10Y*: —

VJPB.L

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 15.28%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: 33.40%
• 3Y*: 14.43%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VAGS.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating	0.31%	6.58%	5.57%	8.56%	-12.52%	-1.30%	6.71%	-0.68%
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	15.28%	17.99%	8.51%	13.43%	-6.28%	1.76%	12.11%	-20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGS.L and VJPB.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019	0.06

Over the past year, VAGS.L and VJPB.L have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGS.L

VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VAGS.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.82	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	2.58	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.34	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	3.07	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.23	9.85	-6.62

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGS.L and VJPB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, smaller than the maximum VJPB.L drawdown of -38.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and VJPB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VAGS.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.34%	-38.31%	+21.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.67%	-10.66%	+7.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.39%	-19.86%	+16.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.34%	-19.86%	+3.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-0.98%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-12.10%	+7.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	3.32%	-2.38%

Volatility

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) is 1.41%, while Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that VAGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VJPB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VAGS.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	4.50%	-3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	14.75%	-11.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.54%	18.00%	-14.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.91%	20.77%	-15.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.60%	21.74%	-17.14%

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VAGS.L vs. VJPB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VAGS.L nor VJPB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VAGS.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating	0.00%	1.43%	3.03%	2.33%	1.45%	0.87%	1.08%	0.10%
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VAGS.L and VJPB.L in my portfolio?

VAGS.L and VJPB.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VAGS.L or VJPB.L?

On fees, VAGS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VAGS.L or VJPB.L?

VAGS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.

What is the main difference between VAGS.L and VJPB.L?

VAGS.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while VJPB.L is Japan Equities. VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGS.L and 0.15% for VJPB.L.