PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than VAGP.L's 0.14% return.


VAGS.L

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.08%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
2.94%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*

VAGP.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.55%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.14%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.12%6.58%5.57%8.56%-12.52%-1.30%6.52%1.98%
VAGP.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
0.14%4.93%2.54%5.85%-13.82%-2.05%5.34%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGS.L and VAGP.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.90

The correlation between VAGS.L and VAGP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGP.L
VAGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VAGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAGS.LVAGP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.06

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

2.85

+0.10

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the VAGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGS.L and VAGP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, smaller than the maximum VAGP.L drawdown of -18.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and VAGP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAGS.LVAGP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.34%

-18.13%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-2.77%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.35%

-4.01%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-17.71%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-3.79%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-6.61%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.04%

-0.04%

Volatility

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L) at 0.96%. This indicates that VAGS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAGS.LVAGP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.96%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

2.85%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

3.44%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

4.80%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

4.48%

+0.10%

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VAGS.L and VAGP.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAGS.L vs. VAGP.L - Dividend Comparison

VAGS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
VAGP.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
3.55%3.50%3.08%2.37%1.46%0.86%1.21%0.59%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%1.43%3.03%2.33%1.45%0.87%0.91%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAGS.L and VAGP.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGS.L and VAGP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAGS.L and VAGP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer