PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAGS.L is traded in GBP, while PRIG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than PRIG.L's -0.87% return.


VAGS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.45%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*

PRIG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.80%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
-1.36%
1Y
1.26%
3Y*
-0.72%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.19%4.96%2.39%5.94%-13.72%-2.14%5.52%2.06%
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.87%-0.19%-1.79%-1.09%-8.28%-5.90%5.97%-2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGS.L and PRIG.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2019

0.48

The correlation between VAGS.L and PRIG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAGS.L
PRIG.L

Financial Services

100.0%
2.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

7.7%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

86.2%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VAGS.L
100.0%
PRIG.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L

-

Communication Services

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L

-

Energy

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L

-

Healthcare

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L
7.7%

Industrials

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L

-

Real Estate

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L

-

Technology

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L
86.2%

Utilities

VAGS.L

-

PRIG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PRIG.L
PRIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAGS.LPRIG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.05

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

0.28

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

0.54

+2.87

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGS.L and PRIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAGS.LPRIG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.26

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.31

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

-0.12

+0.24

Drawdowns

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.99%, smaller than the maximum PRIG.L drawdown of -26.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and PRIG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAGS.LPRIG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.99%

-26.02%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-4.46%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.93%

-5.35%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.60%

-17.03%

-0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-23.84%

+20.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-16.42%

+9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

2.32%

-1.41%

Volatility

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) at 1.26%. This indicates that VAGS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAGS.LPRIG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.26%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

3.50%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

4.85%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

7.13%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.57%

7.75%

-3.18%

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIG.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAGS.L vs. PRIG.L - Dividend Comparison

VAGS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.98%2.96%2.31%1.97%1.72%1.50%1.75%1.23%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAGS.L and PRIG.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAGS.L.

VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while PRIG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGS.L and 0.05% for PRIG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAGS.L and PRIG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer