PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAGS.L is traded in GBP, while FTFX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTFX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FTFX.L's 6.87% return.


VAGS.L

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.08%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
2.94%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*

FTFX.L

1D
0.42%
1M
0.56%
6M
5.28%
YTD
6.87%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.12%6.58%5.57%8.56%-12.52%-1.30%6.52%1.98%
FTFX.L
First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)
6.87%0.44%9.81%4.47%10.62%-2.51%-2.61%-3.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGS.L and FTFX.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FTFX.L
FTFX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FTFX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAGS.LFTFX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

2.29

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

6.18

-3.23

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the FTFX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGS.L and FTFX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FTFX.L drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and FTFX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAGS.LFTFX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.34%

-15.71%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-4.14%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.35%

-11.41%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-12.32%

-4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.42%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-6.07%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.54%

-0.54%

Volatility

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) is 1.12%, while First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that VAGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTFX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAGS.LFTFX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

2.27%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

6.66%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

8.92%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

10.78%

-5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

10.08%

-5.50%

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FTFX.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VAGS.L vs. FTFX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VAGS.L nor FTFX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FTFX.L
First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%1.43%3.03%2.33%1.45%0.87%0.91%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAGS.L and FTFX.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTFX.L.

VAGS.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while FTFX.L is Currency. VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while FTFX.L tracks Bloomberg G10 Carry Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGS.L and 0.75% for FTFX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAGS.L and FTFX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer