PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAGS.L is traded in GBP, while ERNA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ERNA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than ERNA.L's 3.88% return.


VAGS.L

1D
0.08%
1M
1.12%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.16%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
5.99%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*

ERNA.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.21%
YTD
3.88%
6M
4.30%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.97%6.58%5.57%8.56%-12.52%-1.30%6.71%1.98%
ERNA.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.88%-2.62%7.50%0.17%13.52%1.06%-1.70%-4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGS.L and ERNA.L is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

-0.12

The correlation between VAGS.L and ERNA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNA.L
ERNA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ERNA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAGS.LERNA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.60

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

4.38

-0.67

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the ERNA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGS.L and ERNA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, which is greater than ERNA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and ERNA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAGS.LERNA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.34%

-15.54%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-4.92%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.39%

-9.71%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-15.54%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-2.71%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-6.88%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.80%

-0.84%

Volatility

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) is 1.08%, while iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that VAGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERNA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAGS.LERNA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.58%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

4.94%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55%

6.55%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

8.47%

-3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

8.75%

-4.16%

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAGS.L vs. ERNA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VAGS.L nor ERNA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ERNA.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%1.43%3.03%2.33%1.45%0.87%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAGS.L and ERNA.L have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAGS.L.

VAGS.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while ERNA.L is Corporate Bonds. VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while ERNA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGS.L and 0.09% for ERNA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAGS.L and ERNA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer