PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAGS.L vs. COMM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAGS.L is traded in GBP, while COMM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the COMM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than COMM.L's 24.65% return.


VAGS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.45%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*

COMM.L

1D
-1.46%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
24.65%
6M
23.36%
1Y
38.99%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.19%4.96%2.39%5.94%-13.72%-2.14%5.52%2.06%
COMM.L
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
24.65%8.53%6.19%-12.55%28.34%29.04%-7.09%-0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGS.L and COMM.L is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2019

-0.19

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between VAGS.L and COMM.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.19 to -0.44, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAGS.L
COMM.L

Financial Services

100.0%
17.8%

Basic Materials

-

35.8%

Communication Services

-

12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.7%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

5.8%

Technology

-

5.6%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VAGS.L
100.0%
COMM.L
17.8%

Basic Materials

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L
35.8%

Communication Services

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L
9.7%

Energy

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L

-

Healthcare

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L

-

Industrials

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L

-

Real Estate

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L
5.8%

Technology

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L
5.6%

Utilities

VAGS.L

-

COMM.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

COMM.L
COMM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
COMM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
COMM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAGS.LCOMM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.38

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

5.18

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

11.78

-8.37

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the COMM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGS.L and COMM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAGS.LCOMM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

2.09

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.74

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.51

-0.40

Drawdowns

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.99%, smaller than the maximum COMM.L drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and COMM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAGS.LCOMM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.99%

-28.49%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-7.49%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.93%

-14.73%

+10.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.60%

-28.49%

+10.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-5.17%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-12.15%

+5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

3.30%

-2.39%

Volatility

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) is 1.44%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that VAGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAGS.LCOMM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

6.19%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

16.45%

-13.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

18.59%

-15.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

16.51%

-11.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.57%

15.38%

-10.81%

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than COMM.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAGS.L vs. COMM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VAGS.L nor COMM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VAGS.L and COMM.L have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for COMM.L.

VAGS.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while COMM.L is Commodities. VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while COMM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGS.L and 0.19% for COMM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAGS.L and COMM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer