PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAGF.DE is traded in EUR, while EXCS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EXCS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGF.DE achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than EXCS.L's 38.76% return.


VAGF.DE

1D
0.47%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
1.28%
3Y*
2.14%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*

EXCS.L

1D
3.28%
1M
4.22%
YTD
38.76%
6M
43.53%
1Y
66.03%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VAGF.DE
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%3.03%0.83%4.52%-14.84%-0.54%
EXCS.L
iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
38.76%19.64%10.51%13.39%-13.13%-25.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGF.DE and EXCS.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021

0.06

The correlation between VAGF.DE and EXCS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGF.DE
VAGF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
VAGF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

EXCS.L
EXCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EXCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EXCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAGF.DEEXCS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.56

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

5.30

-4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

19.36

-18.51

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the EXCS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGF.DE and EXCS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGF.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum EXCS.L drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGF.DE and EXCS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAGF.DEEXCS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-36.91%

+17.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-12.08%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.43%

-19.99%

+15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.70%

-3.41%

-7.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-22.29%

+13.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

3.31%

-2.17%

Volatility

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE) is 1.56%, while iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that VAGF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXCS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAGF.DEEXCS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

9.03%

-7.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

17.89%

-14.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.21%

20.57%

-15.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.18%

24.57%

-19.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

24.57%

-19.65%

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGF.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EXCS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAGF.DE vs. EXCS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VAGF.DE nor EXCS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VAGF.DE and EXCS.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGF.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGF.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EXCS.L.

VAGF.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while EXCS.L is Emerging Markets Equities. VAGF.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted and Scaled (EUR Hedged), while EXCS.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGF.DE and 0.18% for EXCS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAGF.DE and EXCS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer