VACNY vs. CSCO
VACNY (VAT Group AG) and CSCO (Cisco Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. VACNY operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while CSCO operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 5 years, VACNY returned 15.22%/yr vs 19.23%/yr for CSCO. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VACNY vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VACNY achieves a 56.47% return, which is significantly higher than CSCO's 52.77% return.
VACNY
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -12.72%
- 6M
- 17.47%
- YTD
- 56.47%
- 1Y
- 122.07%
- 3Y*
- 23.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 39.93%
CSCO
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 49.46%
- YTD
- 52.77%
- 1Y
- 76.41%
- 3Y*
- 33.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.23%
- 10Y*
- 17.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.18B | $2.38B | $2.92B | |
VACNY VAT Group AG | $954.76K | $1.32M | $880.12K |
VACNY vs. CSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VACNY VAT Group AG | 56.47% | 31.66% | -24.10% | 86.29% | -45.24% | 113.59% | 122.02% |
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 52.77% | 33.47% | 21.00% | 9.30% | -22.46% | 45.76% | -3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VACNY and CSCO is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2020 | 0.17 |
The correlation between VACNY and CSCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VACNY:
$22.51B
CSCO:
$457.17B
VACNY:
CHF 1.44
CSCO:
$3.00
VACNY:
42.10
CSCO:
38.69
VACNY:
16.90
CSCO:
32.46
VACNY:
8.72
CSCO:
7.62
VACNY:
26.66
CSCO:
9.46
VACNY:
CHF 2.08B
CSCO:
$60.75B
VACNY:
CHF 1.05B
CSCO:
$39.08B
VACNY:
CHF 620.75M
CSCO:
$13.98B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VACNY vs. CSCO — Risk / Return Rank
VACNY
CSCO
VACNY vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VAT Group AG (VACNY) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VACNY | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.40 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.21 | 4.85 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.89 | 11.72 | +7.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VACNY vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VACNY drawdown since its inception was -63.55%, smaller than the maximum CSCO drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VACNY and CSCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VACNY | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.55% | -89.26% | +25.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.76% | -15.33% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.87% | -20.16% | -28.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.55% | -36.68% | -26.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.66% | -10.44% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.34% | -40.01% | +19.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 6.33% | -0.17% |
Volatility
VACNY vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison
VAT Group AG (VACNY) has a higher volatility of 15.33% compared to Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) at 10.19%. This indicates that VACNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VACNY | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.33% | 10.19% | +5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.84% | 29.00% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.32% | 32.79% | +12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.27% | 25.35% | +23.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.11% | 26.07% | +28.04% |
Dividends
VACNY vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison
VACNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than CSCO's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1.43% | 2.12% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% |
VACNY VAT Group AG | 1.18% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.39% | 1.97% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VACNY vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between VAT Group AG and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VACNY vs. CSCO - Profitability Comparison
VACNY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, VAT Group AG reported a gross profit of 179.03M and revenue of 522.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.
CSCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.
VACNY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, VAT Group AG reported an operating income of 124.70M and revenue of 522.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
CSCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.
VACNY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, VAT Group AG reported a net income of 100.91M and revenue of 522.90M, resulting in a net margin of 19.3%.
CSCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VACNY and CSCO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VACNY has higher volatility (15.33%) compared to CSCO (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VACNY dropped -63.55% vs CSCO's -89.26%.
VACNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VACNY and CSCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer