PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAB.TO achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than ZDB.TO's 1.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VAB.TO having a 1.51% annualized return and ZDB.TO not far ahead at 1.57%.


VAB.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.70%
YTD
1.62%
6M
0.78%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
1.51%

ZDB.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.48%
YTD
1.53%
6M
0.70%
1Y
2.71%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.62%2.28%3.98%6.90%-11.86%-2.88%8.26%6.77%1.13%2.30%
ZDB.TO
BMO Discount Bond
1.53%2.03%4.26%6.69%-11.99%-2.77%9.50%6.74%1.33%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VAB.TO and ZDB.TO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2014

0.78

The correlation between VAB.TO and ZDB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.96 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAB.TO
VAB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VAB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ZDB.TO
ZDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ZDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAB.TOZDB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.11

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

0.97

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

2.23

+0.39

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the ZDB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAB.TO and ZDB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAB.TOZDB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.63

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.09

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.25

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.38

+0.01

Drawdowns

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, roughly equal to the maximum ZDB.TO drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAB.TO and ZDB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAB.TOZDB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.39%

-18.09%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-2.79%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.31%

-5.07%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

-16.25%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.39%

-18.09%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-1.45%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-4.21%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.22%

-0.02%

Volatility

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO) have volatilities of 1.59% and 1.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAB.TOZDB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.55%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

3.32%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

4.34%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

6.52%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.48%

6.40%

+0.08%

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAB.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZDB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAB.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Dividend Comparison

VAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than ZDB.TO's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.32%3.33%3.19%2.95%2.87%2.48%2.50%2.65%2.79%2.77%2.75%2.78%
ZDB.TO
BMO Discount Bond
2.00%2.28%2.38%2.42%2.52%2.16%2.06%2.20%2.07%2.06%1.95%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VAB.TO and ZDB.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VAB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for ZDB.TO.

VAB.TO tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Canadian Float Adjusted Bond Index, while ZDB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Discount Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAB.TO and 0.10% for ZDB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAB.TO and ZDB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer