PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAB.TO achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than HBB.TO's 2.02% return. Over the past 10 years, VAB.TO has outperformed HBB.TO with an annualized return of 1.57%, while HBB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.36% annualized return.


VAB.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.17%
6M
1.94%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
1.57%

HBB.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.02%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
1.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
2.17%2.28%3.98%6.90%-11.86%-2.88%8.27%6.78%1.14%2.31%
HBB.TO
Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF
2.02%1.84%3.96%5.76%-11.94%-2.35%8.33%5.81%1.19%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VAB.TO and HBB.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014

0.80

The correlation between VAB.TO and HBB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAB.TO
VAB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VAB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

HBB.TO
HBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAB.TOHBB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.12

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.12

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

2.52

+0.41

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAB.TO and HBB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, roughly equal to the maximum HBB.TO drawdown of -18.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAB.TO and HBB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAB.TOHBB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.39%

-18.23%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-2.78%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.31%

-5.56%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

-16.19%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.39%

-18.23%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-2.45%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-4.57%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.23%

-0.03%

Volatility

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) have volatilities of 1.06% and 1.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAB.TOHBB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.08%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.36%

3.38%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

4.48%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

6.55%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

7.09%

-0.62%

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VAB.TO and HBB.TO have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Dividend Comparison

VAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, while HBB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBB.TO
Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.30%3.33%3.19%2.95%2.87%2.48%2.51%2.65%2.80%2.77%2.75%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VAB.TO and HBB.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAB.TO and HBB.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VAB.TO tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Canadian Float Adjusted Bond Index, while HBB.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAB.TO and HBB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer