VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO
VAB.TO (Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds. VAB.TO is passively managed, while CBIL.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VAB.TO returned 4.12%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for CBIL.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAB.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CBIL.TO.
Performance
VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAB.TO achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than CBIL.TO's 0.85% return.
VAB.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.12%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
CBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VAB.TO Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.62% | 2.28% | 3.98% | 3.92% |
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.85% | 2.68% | 4.47% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAB.TO and CBIL.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2023 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VAB.TO
CBIL.TO
VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAB.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -22.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 5.38 | -4.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 58.74 | -57.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.61 | 339.60 | -336.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAB.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 9.47 | -8.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 11.64 | -11.25 |
Drawdowns
VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAB.TO and CBIL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAB.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.39% | -0.06% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -0.04% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.31% | -0.06% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | 0.00% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -0.00% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 0.01% | +1.19% |
Volatility
VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that VAB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAB.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 0.08% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.45% | 0.19% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38% | 0.25% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 0.31% | +6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.48% | 0.31% | +6.17% |
VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAB.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CBIL.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
VAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than CBIL.TO's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.29% | 2.59% | 4.38% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAB.TO Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.32% | 3.33% | 3.19% | 2.95% | 2.87% | 2.48% | 2.50% | 2.65% | 2.79% | 2.77% | 2.75% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAB.TO and CBIL.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VAB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VAB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CBIL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAB.TO and 0.10% for CBIL.TO.
Find the right allocation for VAB.TO and CBIL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer