PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAB.TO vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAB.TO vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAB.TO is traded in CAD, while BND is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BND values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VAB.TO having a 1.62% return and BND slightly lower at 1.55%. Over the past 10 years, VAB.TO has underperformed BND with an annualized return of 1.51%, while BND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.31% annualized return.


VAB.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.70%
YTD
1.62%
6M
0.78%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
1.51%

BND

1D
0.22%
1M
2.27%
YTD
1.55%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAB.TO vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.62%2.28%3.98%6.90%-11.86%-2.88%8.26%6.77%1.13%2.30%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
1.55%2.17%10.09%3.33%-6.92%-2.75%5.89%3.49%8.36%-3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VAB.TO and BND is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011

0.49

The correlation between VAB.TO and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAB.TO vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAB.TO
VAB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VAB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAB.TO vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAB.TOBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.47

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

3.36

-0.74

VAB.TO vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAB.TO and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAB.TOBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.19

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.38

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.29

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.43

-0.04

Drawdowns

VAB.TO vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAB.TO and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAB.TOBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.39%

-19.96%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-4.42%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.31%

-6.73%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

-12.90%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.39%

-19.96%

+1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-1.65%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-6.46%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.93%

-0.73%

Volatility

VAB.TO vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.32%. This indicates that VAB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAB.TOBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.32%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

4.22%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

5.44%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

7.79%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.48%

7.97%

-1.49%

VAB.TO vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAB.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAB.TO vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

VAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.97%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VAB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.32%3.33%3.19%2.95%2.87%2.48%2.50%2.65%2.79%2.77%2.75%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAB.TO and BND have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VAB.TO.

VAB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. VAB.TO tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Canadian Float Adjusted Bond Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAB.TO and 0.03% for BND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAB.TO and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer