VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO
VA.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF) and ZVC.TO (BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VA.TO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, while ZVC.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI Canada Enhanced Value Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VA.TO returned 13.23%/yr vs 16.44%/yr for ZVC.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VA.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ZVC.TO.
Performance
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VA.TO achieves a 32.04% return, which is significantly higher than ZVC.TO's 16.23% return.
VA.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 12.67%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 32.64%
- 1Y
- 55.12%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
ZVC.TO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 6M
- 18.05%
- 1Y
- 43.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.40%
- 5Y*
- 16.44%
- 10Y*
- —
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VA.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF | 32.04% | 25.82% | 10.30% | 12.15% | -9.26% | 0.89% | 13.71% | 11.66% | -9.28% |
ZVC.TO BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF | 16.23% | 30.30% | 15.38% | 11.07% | 2.23% | 31.46% | -3.94% | 10.02% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VA.TO and ZVC.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2018 | 0.31 |
The correlation between VA.TO and ZVC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Industrials
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Financial Services
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Basic Materials
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Healthcare
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
-
Communication Services
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Real Estate
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Consumer Defensive
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Energy
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Utilities
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VA.TO
ZVC.TO
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VA.TO | ZVC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.82 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 7.20 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.84 | 35.91 | -18.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VA.TO | ZVC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 4.27 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.23 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.70 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VA.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, smaller than the maximum ZVC.TO drawdown of -41.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VA.TO and ZVC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VA.TO | ZVC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.81% | -41.00% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.09% | -6.11% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.99% | -13.34% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | -16.17% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -4.92% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.22% | +1.88% |
Volatility
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) at 3.20%. This indicates that VA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZVC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VA.TO | ZVC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 3.20% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.40% | 8.14% | +8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 10.32% | +8.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 13.46% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 17.30% | -2.15% |
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VA.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VA.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Dividend Comparison
VA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than ZVC.TO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VA.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF | 1.65% | 2.17% | 2.31% | 2.57% | 3.09% | 2.35% | 2.14% | 2.53% | 2.84% | 1.71% | 1.62% | 1.88% |
ZVC.TO BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF | 1.95% | 2.23% | 2.87% | 3.32% | 2.96% | 2.41% | 3.30% | 2.66% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VA.TO and ZVC.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VA.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VA.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZVC.TO.
VA.TO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ZVC.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. VA.TO tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, while ZVC.TO tracks MSCI Canada Enhanced Value Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VA.TO and 0.40% for ZVC.TO.
Find the right allocation for VA.TO and ZVC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer