PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VA.TO vs. XIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO

Last updated Jul 4, 2026
See Documentation

VA.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF) and XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VA.TO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, while XIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VA.TO returned 11.43%/yr vs 12.63%/yr for XIC.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VA.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XIC.TO.

Performance

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VA.TO achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than XIC.TO's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VA.TO has underperformed XIC.TO with an annualized return of 11.43%, while XIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.63% annualized return.

VA.TO

1D
2.86%
1M
0.18%
6M
30.57%
YTD
32.28%
1Y
51.98%
3Y*
24.75%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
11.43%

XIC.TO

1D
0.86%
1M
1.59%
6M
11.82%
YTD
12.51%
1Y
33.44%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF		32.28%26.08%10.31%12.16%-9.26%0.89%13.72%11.68%-7.50%21.44%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		12.51%31.51%21.48%11.74%-5.82%23.43%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between VA.TO and XIC.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014

0.53

The correlation between VA.TO and XIC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VA.TO
XIC.TO

Technology

28.1%
7.4%

Industrials

18.6%
10.2%

Financial Services

17.9%
33.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
3.7%

Basic Materials

7.1%
18.1%

Communication Services

4.9%
1.9%

Healthcare

4.4%
0.1%

Real Estate

3.8%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.9%

Utilities

1.4%
3.2%

Energy

1.3%
17.4%

Technology

VA.TO
28.1%
XIC.TO
7.4%

Industrials

VA.TO
18.6%
XIC.TO
10.2%

Financial Services

VA.TO
17.9%
XIC.TO
33.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VA.TO
9.4%
XIC.TO
3.7%

Basic Materials

VA.TO
7.1%
XIC.TO
18.1%

Communication Services

VA.TO
4.9%
XIC.TO
1.9%

Healthcare

VA.TO
4.4%
XIC.TO
0.1%

Real Estate

VA.TO
3.8%
XIC.TO
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

VA.TO
3.2%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Utilities

VA.TO
1.4%
XIC.TO
3.2%

Energy

VA.TO
1.3%
XIC.TO
17.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Often compared with VA.TO:
VA.TO vs. VE.TOVA.TO vs. VPLVA.TO vs. XEF.TOVA.TO vs. XEQT.TOVA.TO vs. VIDY.TOVA.TO vs. VFV.TOVA.TO vs. SPWO
Often compared with XIC.TO:
XIC.TO vs. XIU.TOXIC.TO vs. VDY.TOXIC.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIC.TO vs. VCE.TOXIC.TO vs. XEF.TOXIC.TO vs. VEQT.TOXIC.TO vs. VO

Return for Risk

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VA.TO
VA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VA.TOXIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.36
2.56

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.97
3.31

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

3.62

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

16.39

-0.57

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VA.TO and XIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VA.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -47.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VA.TO and XIC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VA.TOXIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.81%

-47.27%

+21.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-9.29%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-12.27%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.73%

-16.24%

-8.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.81%

-37.21%

+11.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-0.22%

-3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-6.72%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.05%

+1.25%

Volatility

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) at 3.89%. This indicates that VA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VA.TOXIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.10%

3.89%

+8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.06%

10.75%

+9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

13.14%

+8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

13.22%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

14.95%

+0.56%

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VA.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XIC.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

VA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than XIC.TO's 2.00% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF		1.67%2.17%2.31%2.57%3.10%2.35%2.14%2.55%2.89%1.71%1.63%1.93%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		2.00%2.23%2.64%2.96%3.10%2.45%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

VA.TO and XIC.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VA.TO.

VA.TO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XIC.TO is Canada Equities. VA.TO tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, while XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VA.TO and 0.06% for XIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VA.TO and XIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer