PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VA.TO vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VA.TO is traded in CAD, while AVDV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVDV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VA.TO achieves a 32.04% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 17.51% return.


VA.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
12.67%
YTD
32.04%
6M
32.64%
1Y
55.12%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
11.31%

AVDV

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.06%
YTD
17.51%
6M
19.08%
1Y
46.09%
3Y*
29.50%
5Y*
16.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF
32.04%25.82%10.30%12.15%-9.26%0.89%13.71%4.20%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
17.51%42.52%18.00%14.27%-5.16%14.75%3.23%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VA.TO and AVDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.71

The correlation between VA.TO and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VA.TO
AVDV

Technology

22.4%
6.4%

Industrials

20.6%
21.3%

Financial Services

19.4%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
14.4%

Basic Materials

7.2%
22.5%

Healthcare

5.0%
2.1%

Communication Services

4.8%
2.0%

Real Estate

4.3%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
3.4%

Energy

1.6%
10.8%

Utilities

1.6%
1.7%

Technology

VA.TO
22.4%
AVDV
6.4%

Industrials

VA.TO
20.6%
AVDV
21.3%

Financial Services

VA.TO
19.4%
AVDV
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VA.TO
9.7%
AVDV
14.4%

Basic Materials

VA.TO
7.2%
AVDV
22.5%

Healthcare

VA.TO
5.0%
AVDV
2.1%

Communication Services

VA.TO
4.8%
AVDV
2.0%

Real Estate

VA.TO
4.3%
AVDV
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

VA.TO
3.5%
AVDV
3.4%

Energy

VA.TO
1.6%
AVDV
10.8%

Utilities

VA.TO
1.6%
AVDV
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VA.TO vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VA.TO
VA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VA.TOAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.60

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

3.65

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.84

15.82

+2.02

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VA.TO and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VA.TOAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

3.25

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

1.22

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.03

-0.33

Drawdowns

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VA.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VA.TO and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VA.TOAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.81%

-36.44%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-12.67%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-14.64%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

-21.76%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.75%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-4.85%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.92%

+0.18%

Volatility

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 4.74%. This indicates that VA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VA.TOAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

4.74%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.40%

12.09%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

14.28%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

14.02%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

16.18%

-1.03%

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VA.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

VA.TO vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

VA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than AVDV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.74%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF
1.65%2.17%2.31%2.57%3.09%2.35%2.14%2.53%2.84%1.71%1.62%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


VA.TO and AVDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VA.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VA.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

VA.TO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VA.TO and 0.36% for AVDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VA.TO and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer